Contact Information
CCH Journal Delivers Experts View Of Steps Needed To Protect Commercial Aircraft From Terrorist Attack
(RIVERWOODS, ILL., October 9, 2001) While the initial reaction to the
September 11 terrorist attacks is to try to determine precisely who is to blame for failed
airport and aircraft security, the fact is the system is full of shortcomings, according
to noted aviation analyst John Nance, writing for a special report in Issues in
Aviation Law and Policy (IALP), a journal published by CCH INCORPORATED (CCH).
"The principal systemic reason our airline security system failed us
on September 11 is that we built it to screen out a designer enemy, one willing
to conform to our expectations and beliefs as to the nature and level of threat,"
said Nance.
The IALP report, "Denial of Access: Hardening Our Defenses Against
Terrorist Manipulations of Commercial Aircraft," details the procedural,
philosophical and legal changes that need to be made in three principal security areas:
airport passenger screening, airborne aircraft security and aircrew identification
security.
"Johns perspective, based on his experience as both a commercial aircraft
pilot and an aviation analyst, provides a realistic, thought-provoking analysis of
feasible, system-wide changes that need to be considered," said CCH Aviation Law
Group and Issues in Aviation Law and Policy Managing Editor Christine Graf.
Among the steps detailed in the report is federalizing airport screening through
congressional funding and creation of a federal security force of trained law enforcement
officers who have at least the same stature as that of U.S. Customs Service officers.
"What we have done for thirty years is a terrible failure," Nance explains,
adding that it was based on "unacceptably incompetent workers engaged in running a
substandard substitute for a professional system, one that fell so far short of its
intended function that acceptance of the screening system as a norm became, in effect, an
inadvertent fraud on the security of the flying public."
Significantly improving the physical security of commercial aircraft also is essential.
"Indeed to restore public confidence in the safety of our airline system, we must
be able to permanently assure that no one can force his way into a cockpit and take over
an airliner, regardless of whats happening in the passenger cabin," according
to the report.
Among the steps detailed to fortify aircraft security are: impenetrable cockpit doors,
replacement of cockpit keys with electronic coders, cabin emergency alert systems and
video surveillance systems that allow pilots to monitor the cabin.
"The ability to see what is happening in the cabin can make all the difference in
defending the cockpit and the aircraft, and in giving the pilots enough advance notice to
use flight maneuvers, depressurization or other methods to stabilize the situation,"
Nance explains.
The report also covers the more controversial topics of arming pilots and training
flight crews in hand-to-hand combat.
The final focus of the report is on aircrew identification security. Nance recommends a
uniform national system replace the current hodge-podge of different security procedures,
badges and background checks based on the differing requirements of the various airport,
airline and support vendors.
The IALP report explains what would be required in developing unified background
security checks and a unified system of identification for all personnel having contact
with commercial aircraft.
While the report details many of the steps that need to be considered, Nance also
cautions that policymakers must take a balanced approach.
"The framers of these changes must be acutely aware that, while the American
public will accept massive inconveniences in the short term, the future of a robust U.S.
airline industrys ability to maintain capacity at, or near, previous levels of
demand depends on a difficult balance between passengers feeling safe on one hand, and, on
the other, passengers determining that the time, trouble and expense required to use the
system is sufficiently user-friendly to justify their patronage," he said.
About Issues in Aviation Law and Policy
Launched in Spring 2001 by the CCH Business and Finance Group, Issues in Aviation
Law and Policy provides sophisticated discussion of issues affecting and influencing
the future of business, government and social policy in civil aviation worldwide. An
annual subscription to the loose-leaf journal with semi-annual updates is $220, plus
applicable tax, shipping and handling.
The 25-page special report "Denial of Access: Hardening Our Defenses Against
Terrorist Manipulation of Commercial Aircraft" also can be purchased separately
for $9.95, plus applicable tax, shipping and handling. For more information, or to order,
call 800-449-6435 or visit http://onlinestore.cch.com.
About CCH INCORPORATED
CCH INCORPORATED, founded in 1913, has served four generations of business
professionals and their clients. The company produces approximately 900 print and
electronic products for tax, legal, securities, human resources, health care and small
business markets. CCH is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wolters Kluwer North America. The
CCH web site can be accessed at www.cch.com.
The CCH Business and Finance Group web site can be accessed at http://business.cch.com.
-- ### --
nb-01-117
|